Add new comment

This is great. But who at FASEA approved the exam? It doesn't meet the criteria set out in the legislation, so 600 advisers just sat an exam which isn't valid (ie. it did not conform to Standard 9.2). How long will it take FASEA to admit their mistake? It will be interesting to see how an organisation which purports to have such high morals and ethics, responds to their first crisis. So far, all I hear is crickets....